Need a hand? All the help you want just a few clicks away
Hi,I carried out choice based conjoint analysis using the normal conditional logit model and Hierarchical Bayes regression. I understand that HB analysis gives extra insight as it gives individual level utilities for the various characteristics, however in the HB analysis, when all the mean utilities were aggregated into overall mean utilities, the relative importance of the various attributes changed in order of importance, when compared to the the analysis run through the conditional logit model.With this in mind, obviously both forms of analysis gives substantially different results when in terms of the overall sample. Which form of analysis would give more reliable results? Is there any reason to think that one form of analysis is more effective than the other in giving accurate results?Thanking you,Aidan
Both methods may indeed lead to different results. The HB method is more robust as it borrows more effectively information from the population (means and covariances) describing the preferences of other respondents in the same dataset.
One thing you should be sure of when running CBC-HB is the convergence quality, before interpreting any result.
XLSTAT first steps and statistical learning resources
The place where you will master all of XLSTAT features
Any feature or option you’d like us to develop?
For those of you who prefer video help